5 assumptions of radiometric dating

Despite the known limitations, radiometric dating must continue as a hoodwinking art in the hands of evolution industry.Without “many thousand millions of years,” the theory of biological evolution would collapse further into chaos.Since the convergence of scientific natural evidence actually undermines the validity of radiometric dating.Using non-radiometric indicators, the age of the Earth is compatible with the Genesis account rather than millions and billions of years.A long-age of the Earth is an absolute pre-requisite for the theory of biological evolution.Based on evidence from radiometric dating, the age of the Earth has been estimated to be approximately 4.5 billion years.[and] the age is calculated using assumptions about the past that cannot be proven.” Similar to the radiometric problem of the 1.8 million year old Dmanisi skull found in the same strata a medieval ninth century A. As Scott points out, “If the dating methods are an objective and reliable means of determining ages, they should agree…However, with radiometric dating, the different techniques often give different results.” The age measured from radiometric dating of rocks from the Grand Canyon by Austin was 10,000 years using the Potassium-Argon (K-Ar) method but 2,600,000 years with the Lead-Lead (Pb-Pb) method. Within the realm of science, arbitrarily selecting data is an act of flagrant fraud.

While expecting as age of 13 years, the laboratory reported a staggering dating range from 340,000 to 2.8 million years.

The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) recently ran the story “1.8 million-year-old skull may revise understanding of human evolution.” Since the skull was unearthed in a medieval ninth century A. village in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia known as Dmanisi, the obvious question centers on the validity of the million year radiometric dating of the skull found within the same geological stratum as the medieval ninth century A. Without question, the theory of evolution from a single cell to a sophisticated carnivore demands millions and billions of years−not thousands of years.

What’s driving the demand for millions of years dating; is it science or is it theory?

These non-radiometric indicators include – Estimating the Earth to be millions and billions of years was popular in during the nineteenth century with the early uses of radiometric dating confirming Hershel’s “many thousand million years.

”Since then, investigators have increasingly recognized the limitations of radiometric dating techniques, especially in the context of non-radiometric dating techniques, to establish an age for the Earth.

Leave a Reply